It's probably a long shot, but the only line of thought that comes to my mind is that the nearby entities have been set as unused. Have you tried using ent_setunused (ent, false) to insure the ent_near selection is recognized?
Joe
User since V2.4
User since V2.4
hanks for your input Joe. It's an interesting thought and plausible explanation of the behaviour. But the original entity located by the ent_near call is part of the collection added to the selection set, so it is obviously not set unused (or ent_near would not have found it).
Thanks,
David H
Thanks,
David H
David Henderson
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests